Driving Directions

Contact Us

News & Notices

Expand All | Collapse All

SRPC Administration
Staff
Exec. Committee & Commissioners
Regional Impact Committee
Minutes & Agendas
Employment
Driving Directions
Contact Us
Mission
Communities
Meetings & Workshops
Regional Planning
Regional Master Plan
Reg. Master Plan Download
Vision 2020
Recent Adoptions
Bi-State Economic Summit
Links to NH RPCs
Land Use
Land Use
Housing
Mapping & GIS
About Our Mapping
GIS Estimates & Fees
Natural Resources
Conservation Planning
Hazard Mitigation
Water Resource Mgmt.
Transportation
Rt 125 Corridor Study
Draft Metro Plan
Transportation Services
MPO Policy Committee
TAC
Transportation Documents
Minutes
Library
Fact Sheets
HOW-TO Series
Newsletters
Presentations
Press Releases
Publication Archives
Planning Data
Census & Demographics
Building Permits
Population Estimates
Traffic Count Data
Events & Links
Events & Notices
Links
Home Page

 

 

 

UNH Stormwater Center Report Publishes First Year of Data

The CICEET-sponsored University of New Hampshire Stormwater Center has published its first year of field data. The 2005 Data Report evaluates the effectiveness of 12 stormwater treatments in protecting water quality and reducing runoff. You can browse the report online:

http://ciceet.unh.edu/news/releases/stormwater_report_05/

This report is intended as a resource for land use decision makers who must comply with Phase II of the Clean Water Act. Under these regulations, U.S. communities with a population of less than 100,000 are charged to develop more effective stormwater management programs.

The center�s field site is unique in its capacity to test stormwater treatments, side-by-side, under strictly controlled conditions. There, researchers have evaluated three classes of stormwater treatments: manufactured devices such as underground infiltration units and hydrodynamic separators; traditional, structural approaches such as swales and ponds; and Low Impact Development designs (LIDs) such as a biorentention system and a gravel wetland.

The analysis revealed distinctive trends. As a group, LIDS exhibited the highest pollutant removal efficiency, while the performance of manufactured devices varied. Traditional approaches, such as a riprap swale, did poorly to moderately at best. Certain design elements, common to several systems, exhibited the most effective pollutant removal. These included infiltration and filtration mechanisms, large storage volumes and residence time, and dense root mats and herbaceous plants to absorb pollutants.